In the 1960s, Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis decided to make a series of movies based directly on the books of the Bible. This film, based roughly on the first half of the book of Genesis, is the only one that got made. It had a big budget, a talented director (John Huston), a number of stars, a literate and reverent screenplay (by playwright Christopher Fry), and the marketing power of a big studio (20th Century Fox). It actually was a hit, becoming the highest-grossing movie of the year in the U.S., but like Fox's earlier CLEOPATRA, the budget was so big that it didn't quite break even. It was not critically well received and its reputation has suffered ever since, and it hasn't entered the canon of religious movies that get seen on TV every year during the Easter season. What's the problem? Well, it's long, almost three hours, and after a promising opening featuring Adam and Eve, and Cain and Abel, the bulk of the narrative covers just two stories: Noah's Ark and the life of Abraham, called by God to more or less be the founding father of the Jews. There is a brief segment about Nimrod and the Tower of Babel, but it feels uneasily shoehorned in and adds very little to the overarching story. Though the money is up there on the screen—great sets, good cinematography, and probably the best cinematic depiction of the Noah story you'll ever see—it's almost too reverent, feeling at times like a string of Bible illustrations come to life (especially true of the Creation segment). There is little excitement or energy—John Huston's narration is bland—and to some degree, it becomes a waiting game to see who the next stars (in major parts or cameos) will be.
It takes almost half an hour to get from the Creation (clouds, lava, blurry colors) to the expulsion of Adam and Eve, both seen naked with their naughty bits strategically covered, from the Garden of Eden. The shepherd Abel is obedient, but the farmer Cain is shown taking back for himself some of the grain meant to be burned in sacrifice to God, and God's not happy. Cain kills Abel and is doomed to be a roaming fugitive, with a literal black mark on his forehead. Years pass; God is not happy with mankind's behavior and so destroys the world with a flood, saving only Noah, whom he commands to build an ark to save his family and, as we all know, two of each animal species on Earth. This is by far the most spectacular part of the film; the ark sets are huge and the parade of animals (all real with no animatronics or CGI) is impressive. But it's also here that we realize that the storytelling is fairly inert. We know this story and nothing new is added; though John Huston is fine as Noah, neither he nor any member of his family is fleshed out to any degree. After the short Tower of Babel scene, the rest of the movie (the last 90 minutes) is taken up with Abraham and Sarah. This lapsed Catholic boy was relatively unfamiliar with their story except for the broad outlines—Sarah giving birth late in life, God asking Abraham to sacrifice their child—so I was interested in following the plot thread. Included are the stories of Hagar the handmaid, Lot leaving Abraham to eventually establish a new tribe, the fate of the sinful cities of Sodom and Gomorrah (with Lot's wife turning into a pillar of salt being an especially good effect), the birth of Isaac, and the demand of sacrifice.
George C. Scott somewhat surprisingly underplays Abraham rather effectively, but Ava Gardner (as Sarah) suffers the same fate of most of the other actors here—she doesn't get to create a character as much as enact the outlines of one, one that most viewers will already be familiar with. Richard Harris gives an eccentric performance as Cain, leaping about like a dancer, but otherwise actors like Peter O'Toole, Stephen Boyd, Franco Nero, Michael Parks and Gabriele Ferzetti are wasted; they're not bad but they're not called up to do anything special. There is a bit of tarted-up campiness in the Sodom scene, but we're led to believe that Sodom is just generally decadent. My overall verdict: some very well done individual moments here and there, but rather dull in overall affect. Most viewers would probably not choose to watch it again which is maybe why it's not run more often. As far as the title of this movie goes, the onscreen title card reads The Bible in the Beginning ..., but the posters and many critics call it The Bible ... In the Beginning. I got rid of the ellipses altogether which aren't really needed at all. Pictured at top left, Michael Parks as Adam; at right, Ferzetti as Lot and O'Toole as an angel. [Amazon Streaming]





























