data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf0cf/bf0cf641b61c48b8df22e99c9f2477252793ec43" alt=""
Thursday, March 29, 2018
THE WITNESS CHAIR (1936)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf0cf/bf0cf641b61c48b8df22e99c9f2477252793ec43" alt=""
Tuesday, March 27, 2018
TERROR FROM THE YEAR 5000 (1958)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d630/3d6302fe22ed508c445c6c54e8e3c5c3b126b121" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef37c/ef37c8b52cd1033ea2ff8c02da6528dcd5649da2" alt=""
This low-budget sci-fi film was mocked on Mystery Science Theatre 3000, but it's actually a little better than that accomplishment would indicate. If nothing else, the plot points were original in its day. Certainly the idea of exchanging items through time was new, and some critics say that this was the first American movie to show an operating time machine—MGM's adaptation of THE TIME MACHINE was made two years later. In most ways, it looks and feels like your average late 50s B-film, and one might wish that the effect of the woman from the future (Salome Jens) was better—she truly does look laughable in her sequined tights, though the scene in which she takes the face off of a visiting nurse to disguise herself is effective. The acting is passable, with John Stratton (pictured as the Terror's sparkly fingers cast reflections behind him) the standout as the mentally disintegrating Victor (though IMDb says that Stratton never made another movie). Of course, there are some bad movie moments just made for MST3K: the actress in the small role of Miss Blake, Robert's assistant, is awful—or maybe the person dubbing her is awful, or maybe both; there's a silly looking slapdown battle in the water between Robert and Victor; icky comic relief and creepiness are combined in the completely disposable character of Angelo. Interesting and watchable, though perhaps only for sci-fi fans. [YouTube]
Friday, March 23, 2018
SO DARK THE NIGHT (1946)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95df4/95df4d9c88f34544e91e579fa24d79ebc7e2e10d" alt=""
This is a great little film noir (a rural noir rather than urban) not nearly as well known as it should be. The director, Joseph H. Lewis, has a reputation for turning out some stylish looking B-films and this is one—evocative shots, nice use of shadows and darkness, offbeat camera angles, shots that frame people as trapped, either physically or psychologically. Best of all is a creepy lighting shift at the climax as the killer is revealed. Some critics disparage the acting of Steven Geary (pictured), a supporting stalwart who gets a rare lead role here, but I think his low-key performance is a plus for the film. The rest of the cast was mostly unknown to me but all are fine. The chemistry between Geray and Micheline Cheirel (as Nanette) is non-existent, but that actually helps to reinforce the discomfort some of the townsfolk (and the viewers) feel about the age and status difference between the two. Definitely one to seek out, available on DVD as part of the Columbia Pictures Film Noir Classics, Set IV. [DVD]
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
THE DEVIL PLAYS (1931)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e20b/9e20bd6661b29d8e66bb4d71a8fb009e1ad2c092" alt=""
There’s nothing really wrong with the plot or even the writing—it plays out like an average B-mystery, slightly less convoluted than most. But in every other aspect, this is a tedious affair. The director, Richard Thorpe, went on to a long if undistinguished career, but shows very little flair here, though in addition to the atmospheric opening, there's a nicely shot overhead scene of pandemonium breaking out in the tea shop when Mrs. Quincy is found dead. The actors are a rather sorry lot. I’d never heard of any of them, though most had decent careers in supporting roles or B-movies. They are generally competent, though no one stands out as interesting. Jameson Thomas, who plays the novelist, is one of the most colorless B-leads I've ever seen. The movie isn’t exactly actively bad, but it’s just so damned boring. Pictured is Edmund Burns who plays Quincy. [Amazon Prime]
Monday, March 19, 2018
CHILDREN OF PLEASURE (1930)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68f7f/68f7f9058a320bc40d6b7b47edf365ed127884b5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d47f/3d47fe54b49a1245be076943569dbf2228a8ba00" alt=""
Friday, March 16, 2018
FEAR IN THE NIGHT (1947)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f18/06f18552231c8eb2724728f4677091c2165eb4d3" alt=""
This is a solid film noir based on a story by Cornell Woolrich (best-known for writing the story on which REAR WINDOW was based, though most of his works are worth reading). The noir device of the average guy suddenly thrown into a maelstrom of darkness and guilt is the foundation for the whole plot, and DeForest Kelley (pictured), whom you undoubtedly know as Bones on Star Trek, does a nice job as the nervous young man. Paul Kelly is equally good as the cop, and in a bit of a departure for noir, there really is no femme fatale or even a romantic relationship—the ladies stay in the background except for a strange scene which establishes that Clif'’s wife has an over-the-top neurotic reaction to thunderstorms, giving them a reason to look for refuge and to find the murder house. Robert Emmett Keane, a familiar face from nearly 200 character roles, many uncredited, is the villain. The dark visual style is typical noir. If you can get past a few far-fetched plot points, you’ll enjoy this one. [Streaming]
Thursday, March 15, 2018
WILSON (1944)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7661f/7661f0bcdfb10eb1cb433ede26ffda7930042249" alt=""
As with many Hollywood biographical films, this is episodic, the only way really to cover twelve years in anyone's life. And, as in many biopics, he is made out to be the next thing to a saint, with no mention made of his racist and segregationist beliefs. At 2 ½ hours, this has often derided as slow and boring, and the film lost a fair amount of money on its initial release. But viewed now, it comes off pretty well: the pace is fine and Knox's performance, given Wilson’s generally mild persona, is impressive—though things never get exciting, I never lost interest throughout the running time. It's also great fun to see so many familiar supporting players, including Thomas Mitchell, Vincent Price (practically unrecognizable as fellow New Jersey politician William McAdoo), Sidney Blackmer, Charles Coburn, and Marcel Dalio. It's in color which also helps it play well today. This may not make classic movie fans out of young people today, but if you're already a biopic buff, this is a must-see. Pictured are Knox and Ruth Nelson as Wilson's first wife. [TCM]
Monday, March 12, 2018
FAST AND FURIOUS (1939)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cba1e/cba1eaef458a024b6f5c746e2463e127b2b67da3" alt=""
This is the third entry in a B-mystery series (seemingly modeled on the Thin Man movies) which featured the Sloanes, rare book dealers, though you'd be hard pressed to know that from this movie as the book element is pretty much absent here. In each film, a different pair of actors played the leads; Tone and Sothern (pictured) are no better or worse than Robert Montgomery and Rosalind Russell in the previous entry, FAST AND LOOSE (I have not yet seen the first one, FAST COMPANY with Melvyn Douglas and Florence Rice). The mystery elements are weaker than the comic elements, and that's OK as the cast handles the humor well. There is a running gag involving lions that has a nice payoff at the end. The functional direction is by Busby Berkeley, a long way from his classic 1930s musicals. The 70 minutes go by quickly; generally, it's not terribly memorable but not hard to watch. [TCM]
Thursday, March 08, 2018
ELOPEMENT (1951)
Tuesday, March 06, 2018
RASPUTIN THE MAD MONK (1965)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c8e/58c8e3bddf8199576a7a7acc0e7688b378c32c03" alt=""
It's a given that this Hammer movie will not be historically accurate, so there should be no griping about that. This is a case of historical context used for a horror film. The problem is this is not a successful genre mash-up. Christopher Lee tries hard, but he seems stymied in his attempt to give a full-blooded performance—he emphasizes the grungy, decadent side of Rasputin, but not his hypnotically charismatic side, so his rise among the royals seem artificial. The sets, costumes, and color schemes are right out of the traditional Hammer horror films, especially the Dracula series, so for me, this built up expectations of pulpy enjoyment that don't come to fruition—the mayhem near the end is nicely done, but getting there is a bit of a chore. I'd recommend this mostly to Hammer and/or Lee compleists. [TCM]
Friday, March 02, 2018
FOUR JACKS AND A JILL (1942)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d629/2d629c7715d8b7e68e5f72197548a672253083f5" alt=""
As I watched this B-musical unfold, I had this nagging thought that I’d seen it before. It turns out it's an uncredited remake of the early sound musical STREET GIRL. The story is packed with incident but it's easy to follow. Though the 1929 film is primitive in style, I think that version has the edge; this one, though decently acted, is sloppily directed. I like Bolger but he's not the most charismatic lead man around; Shirley and Havoc are fine; the young Arnaz actually steals the show with his slightly shady character. One of Bolger's show-off, long-take dance numbers to a song called "I'm in Good Shape for the Shape I'm In" is hurt by some shaky camerawork. "Boogie Woogie Conga" is the only memorable tune. There is fine support from Eddie For Jr., Jack Briggs and William Blees as the other three Jacks. Pictured are Shirley, Arnaz and Bolger. [TCM]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)